Pruitt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the purpose of the 40-day notice requirement \is apparent: to allow sufficient time to secure the presence of the forensic scientist in those cases in which his or her presence is necessary\
• drug certificate not testimonial under Crawford and admissible under business records exception to hearsay rule
• drug certificate not testimonial under Crawford and admissible under business records exception to hearsay rule
• all holding lab reports are nontestimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Harcrow
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2008-03-13· cited 188×
• Commonwealth v. Vasquez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-03-26· cited 127×
• Sharifi v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-02-01· cited 45×
• MERAS v. Sisto
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-04-23· cited 14×
• Birge v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-05-25· cited 12×
• State v. Laturner
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-07-27· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Melendez-Diaz
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-07-26· cited 7×
• Brooks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-06-27· cited 3×
• Christopher Sandon Ramirez v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CC-20-35)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2025-05-02

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• White v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
• Kentucky v. Stincer
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,461×
• Coy v. Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
• Suter v. Artist M.
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 620×
• People v. Rogers
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-06-24· cited 111×
• Commonwealth v. Verde
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-05-19· cited 110×
• McNabb v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-04-25· cited 84×
• State v. Cunningham
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2005-06-13· cited 56×
• Perkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-04-30· cited 46×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-12-02· cited 45×
• City of Las Vegas v. Walsh
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 42×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-04-30· cited 39×
• Rollins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-05· cited 35×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-07-31· cited 16×
• People v. Bryant
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-03-17· cited 12×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-12-23· cited 10×
• Lee v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-09-17· cited 9×