Skip to main content
· 2/10/2009

Pruett v. Arizona

Citations

  • 606 F. Supp. 2d 1065
  • 21 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1520
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13825
  • 2009 WL 322873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disregarding \each of 22 [plaintiff's arguments in their statement of facts] except for the word \Controverted\ and 23 the references to the record\
  • explaining that Rule 56.1(b) does not permit explanation or argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neil v. Wake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.