Prudential Securities Inc. v. Ruskin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute entitling prevailing party to recover attorney's fees incurred in action to enforce violations of securities transactions
• statute entitling prevailing party to recover attorney’s fees incurred in action to enforce violations of securities transactions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc. v. Radcliffe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-24· cited 19×
• Cooper v. Marriott International, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-01· cited 3×
• Allen Morris Construction Co. v. Salazar
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-19· cited 2×
• Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Core Fund
  M.D. Florida· 2012-07-11· cited 2×
• Miller v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-05· cited 1×
• DeSocio v. Sonic Automotive
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-04
• Morningstar Nursery, Inc. v. Investment Management & Research, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stockman v. Downs
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-31· cited 212×
• Turnberry Associates v. SERVICE STATION
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-02· cited 52×
• DH Blair & Co., Inc. v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-23· cited 14×
• Kintzele v. JB & Sons, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-11· cited 8×