Skip to main content

Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc. v. Radcliffe

Citations

  • 815 So. 2d 708
  • 2002 WL 662682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “no Florida policy which would override the parties’ ability to freely contract on the issue of attorney’s fees”
  • “[W]e detect no Florida policy which would override the parties’ ability to freely contract on the issue of attorney’s fees.”
  • “To disregard the choice of law provision here would do violence to the concept of commercial comity.”
  • statute entitling prevailing party to recover attorneys fees incurred in action to enforce contract
  • statute entitling prevailing party to recover attorneys fees incurred in action to enforce contract
  • a claim for attorney's fees, based on either statute or contract, must be pled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc. v. Radcliffe

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.