N.D. Oklahoma· 4/18/1996
Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Dalton
Citations
- 929 F. Supp. 1411
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12843
- 1996 WL 384845
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding arbitrator guilty of misconduct in making a final decision without hearing \evidence pertinent and material to the controversy\
- vacating arbitrators’ summary dismissal of claim alleging that securities firm improperly amended broker’s U-5 form when factual basis for amendment was contested
- arbitral panel improperly declined to hear material evidence when it granted motion to dismiss without first providing claimant opportunity to have previously filed motion to compel production of documents decided and to present evidence in support of claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sheldon v. Charles SchwabTenth Circuit· 2001-10-31· cited 68×
- Ronald D. Dawson v. New York Life Insurance Company and Nylife Securities, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1998-03-18· cited 47×
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. Marrowbone Development Co.Fourth Circuit· 2000-11-14· cited 31×
- Cicconi v. McGinn, Smith & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-12-22· cited 10×
- Moreland v. PERKINS, SMART & BOYDCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-10-01· cited 9×
- Warren v. TacherW.D. Kentucky· 2000-06-02· cited 7×
- Xerox Commercial Solutions LLC v. Victor SeguraTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2019-07-30· cited 2×
- No. 00-1262Fourth Circuit· 2000-11-14
- Ahmed v. Oak Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-10-17
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Conaway v. SmithTenth Circuit· 1988-08-02· cited 578×
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court· 1855-01-30· cited 262×
- Hoteles Condado Beach, La Concha and Convention Center v. Union De Tronquistas Local 901First Circuit· 1985-05-31· cited 184×
- Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Company of TexasFifth Circuit· 1990-10-31· cited 184×
- Norton v. LiddelTenth Circuit· 1980-03-06· cited 146×
- John M. Foster, Cross-Appellant v. C.F. Turley, Jr., A/K/A Frank Turley, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1986-12-24· cited 120×
- Windon Third Oil And Gas Drilling Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationThird Circuit· 1986-11-10· cited 113×
- Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1990-01-30· cited 101×
- William v. Ficek v. Southern Pacific Company, a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 1964-12-22· cited 88×
- Robbins v. DayEleventh Circuit· 1992-02-27· cited 88×
- Anderman/smith Operating Co. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Fifth Circuit· 1991-01-17· cited 86×
- Sunshine Mining Company v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Clc and Local 5089, United Steelworkers of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1987-08-10· cited 77×
- Alan A. Booth, Counter-Defendant v. Hume Publishing, Inc., and the Hume Group, Inc., Counter-ClaimantsEleventh Circuit· 1990-06-05· cited 72×
- Bowles Financial Group, Inc. v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1994-04-26· cited 68×
- Ficek v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 61×
- Joseph Jenkins and Stanley Hodges, & Cross-Appellees v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc., & Cross-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1988-07-01· cited 46×
- Shat-R-Shield, Inc. v. Trojan, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-10-05· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.