International Union, United Mine Workers v. Marrowbone Development Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that arbitrator committed misconduct by failing to provide parties with full and fair hearing
• stating that the arbitrator acted well beyond the “proscribed limits” of the CBA when he ignored plain language in the agreement
• ‘‘courts owe no deference to an arbitrator who has failed to provide the parties with a full and fair hearing [pursuant to the terms of their arbitration agreement]’’
• “Here, the arbitrator told the Union to meet with Marrowbone, gather information, negotiate further, and, if the dispute was still not resolved, present evidence and argument at a March 26 arbitration hearing.”
• “An arbitrator typically retains broad discretion over procedural matters[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).