Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Tanner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that arbitrators “are not required to either make formal findings of fact or state reasons for the awards they issue.”
• “The record of the arbitration proceedings in this case shows that the issue ... was clearly presented to the arbitrators and the arbitrators declined to state reasons for their conclusions. This ends the inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Exxon Corporation v. Esso Workers' Union, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 28×
• Siegel v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-11-20· cited 23×
• M & L Power Services, Inc. v. American Networks International
  D. Rhode Island· 1999-04-15· cited 8×
• WMA Securities, Inc. v. Wynn
  S.D. Ohio· 2000-06-07· cited 2×
• Puerto Rico Ports Authority v. Misener Marine Construction, Inc.
  D. Puerto Rico· 2002-11-18· cited 1×
• Virginia Eastern Co. v. N. C. Monroe Construction Co.
  Salem County Circuit Court· 2001-06-11· cited 1×
• Exxon v. Esso Worker's
  First Circuit· 1997-07-10
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1995-12-29
• Universidad Interamericana v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
  D. Puerto Rico· 2002-05-31
• Bull HN Information Systems Inc. v. Hutson
  D. Massachusetts· 1999-09-17
• Leader Tech. v. MultiNational Resour
  D. New Hampshire· 2004-12-03

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan
  Supreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 4,743×
• Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
  Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
• Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.
  Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 2,861×
• United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 2,748×
• Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,022×
• Wilko v. Swan
  Supreme Court· 1953-12-07· cited 1,363×
• W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-31· cited 1,238×
• Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1995-03-06· cited 1,102×
• O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-10-12· cited 199×
• Advest, Inc. v. Patrick McCarthy
  First Circuit· 1990-09-07· cited 160×
• The Stanford Daily v. James Zurcher, Individually and as Chief of Police of the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-03-28· cited 133×
• Gateway Technologies, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Gateway Technologies, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-09-27· cited 122×
• Abraham Alvarado-Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp.
  First Circuit· 1988-05-04· cited 104×
• Raytheon Company v. Automated Business Systems, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1989-10-04· cited 86×
• Board of County Commissioners v. L. Robert Kimball & Associates
  Supreme Court· 1990-03-19· cited 74×
• Local 1445, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. The Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1985-11-05· cited 63×
• Challenger Caribbean Corporation v. Union General De Trabajadores De Puerto Rico
  First Circuit· 1990-05-22· cited 55×
• Board of County Commissioners of Lawrence County, Ohio v. L. Robert Kimball and Associates
  Sixth Circuit· 1989-10-31· cited 41×
• Bacardi Corporation v. Congreso De Uniones Industriales De Puerto Rico
  First Circuit· 1982-11-09· cited 32×
• Barbier v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1990-12-03· cited 31×