Skip to main content
E.D. California· 11/4/2011

ProtectMarriage.com v. Bowen

Citations

  • 830 F. Supp. 2d 914
  • 2011 WL 5507204
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that organization supporting California ballot measures to amend state constitution to define marriage as relationship between persons of opposite sex failed to show harassment and retaliation sufficient to justify exemption from public disclosure requirements
  • rejecting an as-applied challenge to a disclosure law in part because many of the alleged incidents of “threats, harassment and reprisals . . . are themselves forms of speech protected by the United States Constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: England

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named ProtectMarriage.com v. Bowen

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.