Skip to main content
· 10/19/2005

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen

Citations

  • 427 F.3d 727
  • 63 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 303
  • 68 Fed. R. Serv. 715
  • 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1029
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22447
  • 2005 WL 2660487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the district court for, among other reasons, failing to consider the efficacy of lesser sanctions as alternatives to dismissal
  • using the Ehrenhaus factors in a Rule 37 context
  • reviewing dismissal under Rule 37 as discovery sanction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Briscoe, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.