Prime Invests., L.L.C. v. Altimate Care, L.L.C.

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 1181

Syllabus

Trial court erred when it dismissed appellant's amended complaint for failure to state a claim for relief because appellant's alleged sufficient facts to put appellees on notice of the claim for a breach of the Broker Agreement or, alternatively, unjust enrichment. Contrary to the trial court's ruling, Ohio's notice pleading rules did not require appellant to specifically identify the buyer by name or set forth specific information supporting its belief as to the possible identity of the buyer. Because the subject of appellant's promissory estoppel claims were governed by the Broker Agreement, the trial court did not err when it dismissed those claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Judgment reversed, in part, and cause remanded.