Keil v. Ohio Atty. Gen.

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 1034

Syllabus

The magistrate properly applied the relevant law to the facts of the case concluding that the respondent's motion to dismiss should be granted as the relators can prove no set of facts entitling them to the relief they seek in mandamus. Moreover, while the respondent did not technically comply with Loc.R. 2(E), the error is harmless and cannot provide a basis for reversal as there was no delay or prejudice from the respondent serving the relators by email. Therefore, we adopt the magistrate's decision as our own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. The relators' objections are overruled, and we dismiss the relators' complaint for a writ of mandamus.