Skip to main content
· 9/10/2014

Prieto Corp. v. Gambone Construction Co.

Citations

  • 100 A.3d 602
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 196
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2902
  • 2014 WL 4437642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this Court could consider a transcript included in the reproduced record, but not in the certified record, if neither party disputes its accuracy
  • holding that the Superior Court could consider a transcript included in the reproduced record, but not in the original record, if neither party disputes its accuracy
  • holding that the Superior Court could consider a transcript included in the reproduced record, but not in the original record, if neither party disputes its accuracy
  • “Concerning questions of credibility and weight accorded the evidence at trial, we will not substitute our judgment for that of the finder of fact.”
  • declining to find waiver based on the appellant’s failure to include trial transcript in certified record when a copy of the trial transcript was made part of the reproduced record and neither party had disputed its accuracy
  • explaining the “meeting of the minds” necessary for a valid contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Shogan, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.