Scungio Borst & Associates v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the presumption of territorial application of statutes and noting section 85.71 “affirmatively states that it applies to employees injured ‘while working outside the territorial limits of this state’ if certain circumstances are met”
• “It is a well-settled presumption that state statutes lack extraterritorial reach unless the legislature clearly expresses otherwise.”
• “‘it is a well-settled presumption that state statutes lack extraterritorial reach unless the legislature clearly expresses otherwise.”
• dismissing civil rights action for lack of territorial jurisdiction
• “ ‘Statutory text may express legislative intent by omission as well as inclusion,’ and we may not read language into the statute that is not evident from the language the legislature has chosen.” (quoting State v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 730 N.W.2d 677, 679 (Iowa 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).