Skip to main content

Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co.

Citations

  • 702 S.W.2d 566
  • 1985 Tenn. App. LEXIS 3053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming that spray-on insulation material that was applied during the original construction of a building constituted an “improvement to real property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawford, Tomlin, McLemore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.