McCay Ex Rel. McCay v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ―[t]he extent and type of proof required to establish the authoritative nature of the medical book or treatise is a matter largely within the discretion of the trial judge‖
• noting that determining the scope of agency “is a question of fact under the circumstances of the particular case … [and] determined by the relation of the parties as they in fact exist under their agreements or acts.”
• other than in a partnership situation, attending physician not liable for professional negli-genee of cover physician absent agency or negligent selection
• other than in a partnership situation, attending physician not liable for professional negligence of cover physician absent agency or negligent selection
• malpractice case where trial court, in essence, \weighed\ the testimony and gave a similar instruction relative thereto
• malpractice case where trial court, in essence, “weighed” the testimony and gave a similar instruction relative thereto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).