Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 10/28/2008

Prevatte v. French

Citations

  • 547 F.3d 1300
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 22418
  • 2008 WL 4716755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the plain language of § 2254 does not provide the basis” for petitioner’s argument that § 2254(d)(2) is applicable and § 2254(e)(1) is inapplicable where no new evidence is presented to the federal court
  • finding Doyle error to be harm- less where we were “overwhelmed by the evidence of [the defend- ant’s] guilt, separate and apart from any evidence of his post-arrest silence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilson, Pryor, Cox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Prevatte v. French

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.