Daniel Anthony Lucas v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning of the state habeas court is irrelevant and petitioner must show there was no reasonable basis for the Georgia Supreme Court to deny relief
• “We are equally unpersuaded that the cumulative effect from Lucas’s Strickland and Brady claims entitles him to relief.”
• “We are equally unpersuaded that the cumulative effect from Lucas’s Strickland and Brady claims entitles him to relief.”
• “We are equally unpersuaded that the cumulative effect from Lucas’s Strickland and Brady claims entitles him to relief.”
• “We are equally unpersuaded that the cumulative effect from Lucas’s and claims entitles him to relief.”
• “For prejudice, Lucas must demonstrate a reasonable probability that his conviction or sentence would have been different . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).