Skip to main content
· 4/15/1987

Prestwood v. Taylor

Citations

  • 728 S.W.2d 455
  • 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 7255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the \distinctive hallmark of the requisite invitation is the possessor's desire that the visitor come onto the premises\ and that \from this the law infers the possessor's representation that the premises are safe for the visitor's entry\
  • explaining that the “distinctive hallmark of the requisite invitation is the possessor’s desire that the visitor come onto the premises” and that “from this the law infers the possessor’s representation that the premises are safe for the visitor’s entry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers, Gammage, Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.