Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/5/1983
Pressley v. State
Citations
- 454 A.2d 347
- 295 Md. 143
- 1983 Md. LEXIS 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recovery of defendant’s fingerprints from burglarized office constituted “but one strand” of circumstantial evidence insufficient, in and of itself, to link the defendant to the crime
- the first passage from Pressley was quoting jury instructions affirmed in that case; the second passage was from Lampitt v. State, 34 Wyo. 247, 267-68, 242 P. 812 (1926)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky, Couch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-29· cited 115×
- Hebron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-22· cited 80×
- Finke v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-08· cited 55×
- Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 50×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-02· cited 24×
- Deese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-17· cited 19×
- Mora v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-25· cited 19×
- Waddell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-12-16· cited 18×
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-01-14· cited 16×
- Jensen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-07-01· cited 14×
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-08· cited 13×
- Kassap v. SeitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-01· cited 13×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-27· cited 11×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-01· cited 10×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-03· cited 4×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-13· cited 2×
- Mack v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-10· cited 2×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 510×
- People v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-06-29· cited 214×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-15· cited 210×
- People v. DukettIllinois Supreme Court· 1974-01-23· cited 146×
- Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-18· cited 112×
- People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1953-04-23· cited 76×
- State v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-07· cited 72×
- Battle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-06· cited 69×
- Alston v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-07-07· cited 55×
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-11-13· cited 54×
- State v. FitzpatrickMontana Supreme Court· 1973-12-04· cited 53×
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-11-11· cited 48×
- Graef v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-14· cited 44×
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BlocherCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1867-06-27· cited 41×
- State v. Medicine BullMontana Supreme Court· 1968-10-18· cited 34×
- Haney v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1856-06-15· cited 34×
- Gilmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-11-09· cited 33×
- Shotkosky v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-01-27· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.