Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 10/6/1992

Pressley v. Haeger

Citations

  • 977 F.2d 295
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24982
  • 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,791
  • 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying harmless error analysis to faulty instructions that, given the evidence, were unlikely to have influenced the jury
  • “Haeger could not discriminate against Pressley on account of race if he did not know Pressley’s race.”
  • “Knowledge plays a role in forming or ascertaining intent. Haeger could not discriminate against Pressley on account of race if he did not know Pressley’s race.”
  • “Knowledge plays a role in forming or ascertaining intent. [The defendant] could not discriminate against [the plaintiff] on account of race if he did not know [the plaintiff’s] race.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Cummings, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.