Seventh Circuit· 10/6/1992
Pressley v. Haeger
Citations
- 977 F.2d 295
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24982
- 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,791
- 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1564
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying harmless error analysis to faulty instructions that, given the evidence, were unlikely to have influenced the jury
- “Haeger could not discriminate against Pressley on account of race if he did not know Pressley’s race.”
- “Knowledge plays a role in forming or ascertaining intent. Haeger could not discriminate against Pressley on account of race if he did not know Pressley’s race.”
- “Knowledge plays a role in forming or ascertaining intent. [The defendant] could not discriminate against [the plaintiff] on account of race if he did not know [the plaintiff’s] race.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Cummings, Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lea Cordoba v. Dillard's Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2005-08-04· cited 471×
- William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthoritySeventh Circuit· 1993-11-24· cited 384×
- Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentThird Circuit· 1999-05-11· cited 276×
- Richard S. Silvera, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Orange County School Board, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 2001-03-30· cited 258×
- Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterSeventh Circuit· 2011-12-15· cited 252×
- Edsel Gusman, Cross-Appellant v. Unisys Corporation, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1993-02-25· cited 154×
- In the Matter Of: Peter Francis GeraciSeventh Circuit· 1998-03-09· cited 105×
- People Who Care v. Rockford Board Of EducationSeventh Circuit· 1996-10-08· cited 90×
- Thomas Barrow v. Lloyd A. Falck, Individually and as Sheriff of Ford County, Illinois, and Ford County, IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1992-10-13· cited 77×
- Walker v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceEleventh Circuit· 2002-03-26· cited 69×
- Guckenberger v. Boston UniversityD. Massachusetts· 1998-05-29· cited 50×
- Bravo Ex Rel. Gonzales v. City of Santa MariaNinth Circuit· 2016-01-12· cited 29×
- Frank Smith, Jr. v. Village of Maywood, a Municipal Corporation, and Robert GraceSeventh Circuit· 1994-02-24· cited 22×
- Jaffee v. RedmondSeventh Circuit· 1998-04-20· cited 21×
- Moore v. University of Notre DameN.D. Indiana· 1998-09-30· cited 14×
- To-Am Equipment Co., Inc. v. Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1997-01-24· cited 12×
- Rupert v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesFederal Claims· 2003-01-24· cited 10×
- Virginia Fogle and Fatina Fogle v. William Chevrolet/geo, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2001-12-26· cited 6×
- Connolly v. National School Bus Service, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1998-02-10· cited 6×
- In Re Tak Communications, Inc.W.D. Wisconsin· 1993-04-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.