Prentice v. Dalco Electric, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that standard in civil case for determin- ing whether evidentiary ruling was harmful is whether ‘‘ruling [likely] would [have] affect[ed] the result’’ and citing Swenson v. Sawoska, 215 Conn. 148, 153, 575 A.2d 206 (1990
• trial court's admission of scientific expert opinion testimony without Porter hearing to assess validity of underlying methodology
• trial court’s admission of scientific expert opinion testimony without Porter hearing to assess validity of underlying methodology
• trial court’s error ‘‘will result in a new trial only if the ruling was both wrong and harmful’’ (emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted)
• ‘‘We conclude that the testimony in question was scientific evidence that required a validity assessment designed to ensure relia- bility pursuant to our analysis in Porter. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial.’’
• ‘‘We conclude that the testimony in question was scientific evidence that required a validity assessment designed to ensure relia- bility pursuant to our analysis in Porter. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Saucier
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-17· cited 151×
• Wiseman v. Armstrong
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-03-09· cited 70×
• Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-16· cited 54×
• Hayes v. Camel
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-08-07· cited 41×
• State v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-02-18· cited 38×
• Klein v. Norwalk Hospital
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-12-21· cited 33×
• Dimmock v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-05-13· cited 28×
• State v. Raynor
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-12-04· cited 27×
• State v. Foreman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-09-16· cited 21×
• State v. Calabrese
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-04· cited 11×
• State v. Collins
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-12-23· cited 8×
• Al-Janet, LLC v. B & B Home Improvements, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-19· cited 8×
• Companions & Homemakers, Inc. v. A&B Homecare Solutions, LLC
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-10-10· cited 8×
• Terio v. Rama
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-09-25· cited 4×
• Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-09· cited 2×
• Kortner v. Martise
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-06-10
• State v. James H.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-06-17
• Tiplady v. Maryles
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-07-28
• Filippelli v. Saint Mary's Hospital
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-10-13
• State v. Raynor
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-08-17

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Fink v. Golenbock
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-23· cited 275×
• Connecticut v. Porter
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
• Swenson v. Sawoska
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-05-22· cited 74×
• State v. Reid
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-09-05· cited 61×
• State v. Kirsch
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-05-06· cited 58×
• State v. Pappas
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-24· cited 50×
• State v. Hasan
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-15· cited 41×
• Ryan Transportation, Inc. v. M & G Associates
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-11-04· cited 39×
• Maher v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-25· cited 23×
• State v. Billie
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-10· cited 22×