Preddice v. Callanan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In our view, petitioner’s allegations demonstrate a mere unilateral expectation of continued employment insufficient to trigger a due process guarantee to a pretermination hearing”
• “In our view, petitioner’s allegations demonstrate a mere unilateral expectation of continued employment insufficient to trigger a due process guarantee to a pretermination hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Caraccilo v. Village of Seneca Falls, NY
  W.D. New York· 2008-09-30· cited 16×
• Preddice v. Callanan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-01-30· cited 2×
• Preddice v. Callanan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-07-07· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Perry v. Sindermann
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,238×
• McLaughlin v. Berle
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-07-05· cited 23×
• Ause v. Regan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-11-14· cited 20×
• Carter v. Murphy
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-03-06· cited 11×
• In re the Arbitration between the City of Binghamton & Binghamton Civil Service Forum
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-05-11· cited 9×