Supreme Court of Delaware· 12/15/2016
Powell v. State
Citations
- 153 A.3d 69
- 2016 Del. LEXIS 649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Rauf decision applies retroactively to “a death sentence that was already final when Rauf was decided”
- holding that Rauf v. State, 145 A.3d 430 (Del. 2016), announced watershed rule
- holding that the defendant’s “death sentence must be vacated and he must be sentenced to ‘imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life without benefit of probation or parole or any other reduction.’” (quoting 11 Del. C. § 4209(d)(2)). 34 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(5
- holding that Rauf applies retroactively
- “Powell’s death sentence must be vacated and he must be sentenced to ‘imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life without benefit of probation or parole or any other reduction.”’ (quoting DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, § 4209(d)(2) (2009))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland, Seitz, Strine, Valihura, Vaughn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court· 2018-09-28· cited 360×
- Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-12-22· cited 110×
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2017-01-17· cited 21×
- Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2017-07-31· cited 18×
- Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-01-25· cited 8×
- & SC16-2133 Patrick Albert Evans v. State of Florida & Juan Rosario v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-02-20· cited 7×
- Tatum v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-16· cited 7×
- State v. SwanSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-02-10· cited 1×
- State v. HassettSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-05-25
- State v. SykesSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-12-07
- Norcross v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-01-02
- Norcross v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-01-11
- Norcross v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-01-18
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-01-31
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-02-21
- State v. Manley State v. StevensonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-02-28
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-03-07
- State v. GarveySuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-03-29
- State v. LacombeSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-04-30
- State v. TaylorSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-06-28
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2016-01-25· cited 2,780×
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 2,419×
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-04-18· cited 1,417×
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2016-01-12· cited 1,067×
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 1,054×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 586×
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-10-14· cited 545×
- Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 416×
- Ivan v. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 268×
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-12-21· cited 248×
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC.Supreme Court· 2014-01-22· cited 200×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.