Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/17/2010
Powell v. State
Citations
- 243 P.3d 798
- 238 Or. App. 678
- 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1435
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[a]n argument grounded in substantive due process * * * asserts that the state’s objective is simply beyond its power to achieve, regardless of how many procedural safeguards it might provide”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bowers v. WhitmanNinth Circuit· 2012-01-12· cited 33×
- Biggerstaff v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29· cited 28×
- Bolden v. Doe (In re Adoption of J.S.)Utah Supreme Court· 2014-11-04· cited 18×
- Luethe v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29· cited 3×
- Jones v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 1×
- Leason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17· cited 1×
- Bowers v. WhitmanNinth Circuit· 2012-02-28
- RIEMENSCHNEIDER v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17
- Leason v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENTCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17
- Riemenschneider v. Crook County ex rel. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 2,938×
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,492×
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 1,262×
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1905-04-17· cited 1,236×
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court· 1937-03-29· cited 943×
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court· 1984-06-18· cited 912×
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 753×
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court· 1938-12-19· cited 505×
- United States v. CarltonSupreme Court· 1994-06-13· cited 295×
- Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.Supreme Court· 1959-01-12· cited 292×
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court· 1932-04-11· cited 166×
- Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court· 1913-04-07· cited 113×
- United States v. HemmeSupreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 87×
- Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court· 2008-05-08· cited 58×
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-04· cited 36×
- Hall v. Northwest Outward Bound School, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-12-20· cited 27×
- Bleeg v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-24· cited 15×
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life And Health Insurance Guaranty AssociationFirst Circuit· 1997-04-02· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.