Skip to main content
· 11/9/2010

Pourmoghani-Esfahani v. Gee

Citations

  • 625 F.3d 1313
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23205
  • 2010 WL 4537035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where the video obviously contradicts Plaintiff’s version of the facts, we accept the video’s depiction instead of Plaintiff’s account.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Hill, Alarcon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.