· 11/9/2010
Pourmoghani-Esfahani v. Gee
Citations
- 625 F.3d 1313
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23205
- 2010 WL 4537035
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where the video obviously contradicts Plaintiff’s version of the facts, we accept the video’s depiction instead of Plaintiff’s account.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmondson, Hill, Alarcon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.