Aubrey H. Aldridge v. Charles Montgomery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff may establish that deliberately indifference by showing that defendants have “intentionally interfer[ed] with the treatment once prescribed”
• finding that complaints of headaches and dizziness, coupled with a history of head injuries, could be a serious medical need
• holding that a 1.5-inch cut over a plaintiff’s eye was a serious medical need where 6 the cut bled for over two hours onto plaintiff’s coat and shirt and created a pool of blood on the 7 floor approximately the size of two hands, and required six stitches
• reversing directed verdict for county officials who had failed to give an inmate, having just received stitches for a cut above his eye, \ice packs and aspirin prescribed by the doctor for pain upon his return to the jail\
• reversing directed verdict for county officials who had failed to give an inmate, having just received stitches for a cut above his eye, “ice packs and aspirin prescribed by the doctor for pain upon his return to the jail”
• one-and-a-half-inch cut over detainee’s eye bleeding for two and a half hours was a serious medical need

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).