Skip to main content

Potter v. State

Citations

  • 547 A.2d 595
  • 1988 Del. LEXIS 235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a defendant’s dilatory actions in retaining counsel can justify a forfeiture of the right to counsel.
  • “A defendant is considered indigent when he is unable to retain legal counsel without impairing his financial ability to provide economic necessities of life for himself and his family.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christie, Horsey, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.