United States v. Kevin Rankin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a rigid insistence on expedition in the face of a justifiable request for delay can amount to a constitutional violation”
• right to counsel of choice must be balanced against requirements of fair and proper administration of justice
• arbitrary denial of defendant's request for counsel of choice requires reversal without showing of prejudice
• \Although the right to representation by chosen counsel is subject to limitations it may not be hindered unnecessarily.\
• “Although the right to representation by chosen counsel is subject to limitations it may not be hindered unnecessarily.”
• arbitrary denial of defendant’s request for counsel of choice requires reversal without showing of prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).