Porter Ex Rel. Porter v. Hardee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying liability under the family purpose doctrine where the plaintiff could not establish that defendant provided the vehicle for “general family purposes”
• judgment for father where minor son lived with parents and received income from working on parent’s farm, bought automobile with his own funds, exercised exclusive control over car, but placed title in father’s name
• “The testimony for the plaintiff, which was corroborated by that of the defendant, therefore, shows that ... the automobile in question was not provided, maintained, or used by the defendant for general family purposes.”
• remanding for entry of judgment in favor of the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).