Campbell v. Paschal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating hypothetical facts relied upon by experts “must have some evidentiary support” (citation omitted)
• “[t]to be competent as an expert, a witness by reason of study or experience or both must possess such knowledge or skill in a business, profession, or science that he is better qualified than the [finder of fact] to form an opinion on the particular subject of his testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).