Poddar v. Clatsop County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e must consider the issue of justiciability sua sponte because it affects the trial court’s jurisdiction to enter the judgments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Utsey v. Coos County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-26· cited 42×
• Powell v. Bunn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-11· cited 27×
• Just v. City of Lebanon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-04-21· cited 18×
• Hood River County v. Stevenson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-03· cited 13×
• Hale v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-14· cited 13×
• Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-08-14· cited 4×
• Crandon Capital Partners Ex Rel. Willamette Industries v. Shelk
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Poddar v. Clatsop County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-10· cited 15×
• Akins v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-03· cited 1×