Hood River County v. Stevenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “[c]ourts have an obligation to consider jurisdictional issues sua sponte”
• vacating judgment and remanding with instructions to dismiss proceeding when party initiating proceeding did not have standing to bring it
• jurisdictional issues need not be raised by the parties, because the court has the obligation to consider them sua sponte
• jurisdictional issues need not be raised by the parties, because the court has the obligation to consider them sua sponte
• jurisdictional issues need not be raised by the parties, as the court has the obligation to consider them sua sponte
• jurisdictional issues need not be raised by the parties, as the court has the obligation to consider them sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).