Plant v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no discrepancy where written sentence reflected formal oral pronouncement of sentence, despite possibly ambiguous comments by the judge elsewhere in the record
• court looked to the formal pronouncement of sentence to determine whether a discrepancy existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1997-01-21· cited 38×
• State v. Williams
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-08-28· cited 20×
• State v. Patterson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-01-20· cited 19×
• State v. Yardley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-06-24· cited 17×
• McCaine v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-02-16· cited 10×
• State v. Bulloch
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-10-13· cited 9×
• State v. Robinson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-04-10· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Doyle E. Raftis, Vernon F. Hawkins, Thomas M. Bugg, Curt Martin, Melville W. Ahlmeyer, Hildreth M. Kniss, Raymond P. Guzy
  Eighth Circuit· 1970-06-16· cited 38×
• Crump v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1971-02-08· cited 5×