Pittsburgh v. Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a distinction between a lawyer who works for a corporation and a lawyer who establishes an individual practice for purposes of assessing a business privilege tax upon the latter but not the former

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Continental Casualty Co. v. Pro MacHine
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-01-17· cited 43×
• City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board v. Adams Avenue Associates
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-01· cited 10×
• Svetik v. Svetik
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-19· cited 9×
• Nine Penn Center Associates v. Tax Review Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-28· cited 3×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-17· cited 2×
• York v. Shoemaker, Thompson & Ness
  York County Court of Common Pleas· 1980-07-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burnet v. Leininger
  Supreme Court· 1932-03-14· cited 347×
• F. J. Busse Co. v. Pittsburgh
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 63×
• Tax Review Board v. D. H. Shapiro Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-11-13· cited 19×
• Tax Review Board v. Belmont Laboratories Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-05-02· cited 13×
• Munnell Appeal
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-09-21· cited 4×