· 3/14/1932
Burnet v. Leininger
Citations
- 285 U.S. 136
- 52 S. Ct. 345
- 76 L. Ed. 665
- 1932 U.S. LEXIS 843
- 10 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1601
- 3 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 909
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It was the husband’s interest that was the subject of the agreement.”
- can't escape tax on profits by assigning them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hughes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.