Pitts v. State
Citations
- 43 Miss. 472
- 2 Morr. St. Cas. 1655
Syllabus
<p>Í. Homicide — Corpus Delicti. — In oases of felonious homicide, the corpus delicti Consists of two fundamental and necessary facts: First, the death; and secondly, the existence of criminal agency as its cause.</p> <p>2. Proof of Corpus Delicti__The death must he proved by direct testimony, or by presumptive evidence of the strongest kind, and the criminal agency may then he established by presumptive reasoning upon all the facts and circumstances of the case.</p> <p>3. Testimony of Experts. — When the dead body or remains have been discovered and identified, and the immediate cause of death remains unknown, the sworn observations and opinions of physicians, surgeons, chemists and other scientific persons who have examined the body or remains, are often of the greatest value as testimony explaining the means of death. ‘</p> <p>4. Confessions. — Facts ascertained by reason of a confession maybe considered in establishing the corpus delicti; but a confession not made in open court, or before the examining magistrate, but, to an individual, uncorroborated by circumstances, ^.nd without proof, aliunde, that a crime has beon committed, will not justify conviction ; but the corpus delicti must he proved independently of extra-judicial confessions, and beyond reasonable doubt; and without such proof of the corpus delicti, evidence of the confession is inadmissible at the trial. Stringfellow v. the State, 26 Miss. B., 157, cited and approved.</p> <p>5. Poisoning — Circumstantial Evidence. — Where a person of generally good health dies suddenly, and the symptoms andappearances indicate narcotic poison of Jamestown weed or stramonium, but are similar also to symptoms common to disease of the heart, or congestion of the brain or stomach, and the testimony and opinions of several physicians who examined the stomach and contents, without any analysis, is conflicting and leave it in doubt, with the probabilities equally balanced, whether the deceased died of poison or of disea
Judges: Peyton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dycus v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-08-10· cited 228×
- Forte v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1937-04-05· cited 87×
- King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1964-11-16· cited 86×
- Daeche v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1918-03-14· cited 86×
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court· 1921-11-22· cited 43×
- State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court· 1921-12-27· cited 39×
- Tarkaney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1931-10-30· cited 33×
- Spears v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1908-03-15· cited 33×
- Gilleylen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 32×
- State v. GebbiaSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1908-06-08· cited 30×
- Meyers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1922-04-21· cited 28×
- Lemons v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-01· cited 24×
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court· 1905-04-28· cited 18×
- Watts v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1950-12-11· cited 16×
- State v. VanceUtah Supreme Court· 1910-07-13· cited 16×
- Gilmore v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-10-24· cited 15×
- Elliott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1966-03-14· cited 13×
- Chase v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-04-15· cited 13×
- Redd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1897-02-20· cited 11×
- Freeman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1956-10-08· cited 11×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.