Chase v. State
Citations
- 46 Miss. 683
Syllabus
<p>1. Plea, nr abatement not replied to —recital in the record oe ISStTE JOINED, NOT CONTRADICTED, -WARRANTS PRESUMPTION OE ISSUE JOINED. — A recital in the record of tlie trial of a capital case that defendant “filed his said two pleas in abatement, upon which, the district attorney joined issue and the court tried the issue on the said pleas in abatement, there being nothing in the record contradicting this recital, and no replications in the record, is sufficient to raise the presumption that issue was joined upon the pleas.</p> <p>2. Plea in abatement not involving question oe eact does not require trial bt jury. — It is not error for the court, without a jury, to dispose of pleas in abatement, which involve no question but an inspection of the record.</p> <p>3. G-RAND JURY — ORGANIZATION OE —WILL BE PRESUMED TO HAVE BEEN LEGAL WHERE RECORD SHOWS ORGANIZATION UNDER SUPERVISION OE THE court. — Where the record shows the organization of a grand jury under the supervision of the court, and it does not affirmatively appear to the contrary, it will be presumed that the grand jury was duly and legally organized.</p> <p>i. Trial eor murder — practice—not error perse eor court to set aside juror until examination oe other jurors. — During the impaneling of the jury fon the trial of the accused, on a charge of murder, one of the special vené-e, after a partial examination touching his qualifications, without being challenged by either party, was set aside by the court to await the examination of other jurors, and, after some time, was again called, when he was peremptorily challenged by the state, ifeld, not to be per se error, and it not appearing that accused had sustained any injury from it, the judgment will not be disturbed on that account.</p> <p>5. G-eeat bodily haem which will jusiipy a homicide with deadly WEAPON — BLOWS WITH PIST AND POOT WILL NOT. — Mere blow with fist and feet do not justify the party assaulted in taking the life of his assailant, by the use
Judges: Takbehl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harveston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-08-20· cited 164×
- Shinall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 47×
- Woodward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 18×
- Posey v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1905-04-15· cited 15×
- Richardson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2014-06-26· cited 9×
- Harris v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-10-15· cited 8×
- Tillman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-11-07· cited 4×
- Nelson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1873-04-15· cited 3×
- McCoy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1911-10-15· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Campbell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1854-11-15· cited 64×
- Pitts v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1871-10-15· cited 52×
- Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1851-01-15· cited 46×
- Pritchett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1853-01-15· cited 45×
- Cotton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 31×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama· 1846-01-15· cited 21×
- Schnier v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1859-11-15· cited 21×
- Henderson v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1854-07-01· cited 19×
- People v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1858-07-01· cited 17×
- Easterling v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1858-04-15· cited 16×
- Stokes & Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 1852-10-15· cited 12×
- Green v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 10×
- State v. FieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1837-04-15· cited 9×
- Patterson v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court· 1866-10-02· cited 9×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1856-08-15· cited 8×
- Schaller v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1851-03-15· cited 7×
- People v. ShorterNew York Supreme Court· 1848-11-06· cited 6×
- Ackley v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court· 1850-09-03· cited 6×
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 2×
- Moore v. McAllisterMississippi Supreme Court· 1857-10-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.