Skip to main content

Pitts v. State

Citations

  • 323 Ga. App. 770
  • 747 S.E.2d 699
  • 2013 WL 4034396
  • 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was reasonable trial strategy to not object to improper statements during the State’s closing argument to avoid drawing the jury’s attention to them
  • trial counsel’s strategic decision to forego objection to avoid drawing jury’s attention to prosecutor’s allegedly objectionable remark “was reasonable and did not constitute deficient performance”
  • problematic aspects of an in-court identification go to the witness’s credibility, which is solely a question for jury determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.