Skip to main content

Pitts v. State

Citations

  • 580 S.E.2d 618
  • 260 Ga. App. 553
  • 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1198
  • 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Kim decision did not “undermine a trial court’s authority to control voir dire and properly inquire about a juror’s ability to be impartial”
  • expert testimony that one bag contained cocaine was sufficient to sustain conviction for trafficking notwithstanding the fact that two other bags were not tested
  • possession of 54 grams of 85 percent pure cocaine was sufficient to sustain conviction notwithstanding the state’s failure to test two of three bags of the drug
  • trial court does not abuse discretion by inquiring into juror’s ability to be fair and impartial but may not rely on insufficient rehabilitative questions to reject clear evidence of potential juror’s bias
  • trial court does not abuse its discretion by inquiring into juror’s ability to be fair and impartial but may not rely on insufficient rehabilitative questions to reject clear evidence of potential juror’s bias
  • “Failure to make a meritless objection is not error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Smith, Andrews, Ruffin, Adams, Barnes, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.