Skip to main content

Piotrowski v. Minns

Citations

  • 873 S.W.2d 368
  • 1993 WL 502515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant is not entitled to a new trial unless the reporter’s notes have been lost or destroyed without appellant’s fault and the parties cannot agree on a statement of facts
  • holding appellant is not entitled to a new trial unless the reporter’s notes have been lost or destroyed without appellant’s fault and the parties cannot agree on a statement of facts
  • holding appellant is not entitled to a new trial unless the reporter's notes have been lost or destroyed without appellant's fault and the parties cannot agree on a statement of facts
  • “A litigant who fails to request that the reporter record pretrial proceedings risks waiver of any complaint with respect to error occurring during those proceedings.”
  • \A litigant who fails to request that the reporter record pretrial proceedings risks waiver of any complaint with respect to error occurring during those proceedings.\
  • “By negative implication, the statute authorizes reporters to cull stale notes from their records after three years from the date on which they were taken.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gonzalez, Hecht, Phillips, Hightower, Doggett, Gammage, Spector, Cornyn, Enoch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Piotrowski v. Minns

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.