Christiansen v. Prezelski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that burden is on appellant to present sufficient record to show error requiring reversal
• providing that appellant bears burden to provide sufficient record to show trial court’s error
• trial testimony pertinent to the question on appeal was not included in the record
• burden is on appellant to present a sufficient record to show error requiring reversal
• burden is on appellant to present a sufficient record to show error requiring reversal
• “An appellant must 10 either comply with [the predecessor to Rule 34.6] or file a complete statement of facts; otherwise, it will be presumed that the omitted portions are relevant to the disposition of the appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).