Skip to main content
· 5/11/1999

Pioneer Mill Co., Ltd. v. Dow

Citations

  • 978 P.2d 727
  • 90 Haw. 289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that inferences to be drawn from the facts alleged in materials considered by the court in deciding a summary judgment motion must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party
  • rejecting for purposes of summary judgment \an affidavit of counsel swearing to the truth and accuracy of exhibits does not authenticate exhibits\ as insufficient to \authenticate exhibits not sworn to or uncertified by the preparer or custodian of those exhibits\ (citation omitted)
  • “On appeal, an award of summary judgment is reviewed under the same standard applied by the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.