Skip to main content
· 11/26/1991

Miller v. Manuel

Citations

  • 828 P.2d 286
  • 9 Haw. App. 56

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that motions to enforce disputed compromise agreements are treated as motions for summary judgment
  • “Affidavits in support of a summary judgment motion are scrutinized to determine whether the facts they aver are admissible at trial and are made on the personal knowledge of the affiant.”
  • “Affidavits in support of a summary judgment motion are scrutinized to determine whether the facts they aver are admissible at trial and are made on the personal knowledge of the affiant.”
  • “Affidavits in support of a summary judgment motion are scrutinized to determine whether the facts they aver are admissible at trial and are made on the personal knowledge of the affiant.”
  • “the opposing party must come forward, through affidavit or other evidence, with specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of material fact” (emphasis supplied; citation omitted)
  • settlement agreement cannot be set aside except for bad faith or fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Huddy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.