Pima County v. Bilby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the property owner must prove to the trier of fact the loss of value
• recognizing that the property owner must prove to the trier of fact the loss of value
• recognizing right of action for decrease in value of land after reconstruction of roadway affected natural flow of drainage water
• explaining that Rule 59(m)’s particularity requirement was not met where the specified grounds for remittitur were that “the verdict and judgment were contrary to the law and evidence”
• noting that “an abutting property owner to a highway has an easement of ingress and egress to and from his property which constitutes a property right,” and that the right cannot be taken or damaged without just compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).