Skip to main content
· 12/27/2001

Pihlajamaa v. Kaihlan

Citations

  • 94 Cal. App. 4th 1122
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10740
  • 114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 865
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 13361
  • 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 3716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he fraudulent breach of contract does not give rise to an action for fraud”
  • “Even assuming that the prevailing case law imposes the burden on defendant, such rule is neither implicit in nor directed by the New York statute and therefore should not affect its constitutionality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benke, McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.