Pierre v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “During closing argument, the prosecutor must confine argument to evidence in the record and not make arguments which cannot be reasonably inferred from the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• EARL L. BOGGESS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-10· cited 3×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-09· cited 3×
• Ricardo Benson Narcisse v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-24· cited 2×
• Toler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-24· cited 2×
• JEROME THURSTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-10-28
• Deandre Shawn Burgess v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-07-09

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bright v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-01-26· cited 23×
• Henry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-15· cited 17×
• Wicklow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-04· cited 12×
• Tindal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 11×
• Linic v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-08· cited 10×
• Hubbard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-02· cited 5×
• Fenster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-29· cited 5×
• Espute v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 4×
• Barnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-13· cited 3×
• Watson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-08· cited 2×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-02· cited 2×