Skip to main content
· 11/29/2006

Fenster v. State

Citations

  • 944 So. 2d 477
  • 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19949
  • 2006 WL 3422151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing that lack of “substantial evidence” in record warranted Appellate Court’s determination
  • affirming lower court’s decision that road abutting developers land was off-site
  • record does not indicate \that an intent to comply with the regulation helped form the collective intent of the commission.\
  • \The action of the commission should be sustained if even one of the stated reasons is sufficient to support it.\
  • \the evidence . . . to support any such reason must be substantial. . . .\
  • § 8-25 directs municipalities to regulate land to be subdivided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.