Pierre v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Pierre’s legal interest as a lessee is but one factor among the totality of circumstances to be considered in determining whether the victim had a superior possessory interest on the night in question.”
• “Because the victim (and not [the defendant]) was actually living in the efficiency on the night in question, the mere fact that [the defendant] held 19 some legal interest in the efficiency (as a lessee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Salvatore Bagnara v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-27· cited 17×
• Wolf v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-03

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-03· cited 87×
• In Interest of ME
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-04-26· cited 33×
• D.S.S. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-12· cited 12×
• Harper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-12-11· cited 10×
• Whetstone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-29· cited 8×
• L.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-26· cited 8×
• Washington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-08· cited 3×
• Breen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-23· cited 1×