L.J. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that on the facts of that case once the defendant was arrested the policy reasons underpinning the recantation defense no longer applied
• concluding that on the facts of that case once the defendant was arrested the policy reasons underpinning the recantation defense no longer applied
• “The standard of review applicable to a motion for judgment of dismissal in a juvenile case is the same as the standard for a motion for judgment of acquittal in a criminal case, de novo review.” (quoting A.A.R. v. State, 926 So. 2d 463, 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• D.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-23· cited 10×
• Pierre v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-09· cited 4×
• L.T. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-09-14· cited 3×
• M.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-27· cited 3×
• MG v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-27
• LJ v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-26
• A.O., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-05-10

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• J.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-15· cited 52×
• A.P.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-21· cited 46×
• P.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-26· cited 20×
• A.A.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-19· cited 20×
• Fripp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-09· cited 16×
• State v. Townsend
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-12· cited 11×