Pierola v. Moschonas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]ourts have ... insisted on objective evidence of fraud, duress, overreaching, undue influence or mistake before setting aside allegedly unfair contracts.”
• noting also that no “meeting of the minds” is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).